Teacher Professional Development in Academic Supervision: A Qualitative Study at “Madrasah Tsanawiah”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v5i3.445Keywords:
instructional supervision, principal, teacher performanceAbstract
This research aims to examine the implementation, supporting and inhibiting factors, and follow-up actions of the principal’s academic supervision in improving teacher performance. A descriptive qualitative method was used for this study. The research participants included 24 teachers and the school principal, with teachers serving as the main informants. Data were collected through documentation, interviews, and observations. Data analysis was performed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, which involves data collection, reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings of the research reveal that: 1) the implementation of academic supervision by the principal involves planning, execution, monitoring, and evaluation based on supervision instruments, which include learning administration tools such as annual programs, semester programs, syllabi, lesson plans, educational calendars, lesson schedules, and a Learning Implementation Plan (RPP); 2) the supporting factors for effective supervision include the availability of school facilities and the teachers’ awareness and preparedness, while the inhibiting factors include the principal's busy schedule and academic background; 3) follow-up supervision is conducted by the teacher coordinator through an assignment letter. The results of this study provide valuable insights into the principal's role in academic supervision and its impact on teacher performance improvement at MTs Mathalibul Huda Jepara.
Downloads
References
Alkrdem, M. (2020). Contemporary educational leadership and its role in converting traditional schools into professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(2), 144–171. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.4298
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2013). Presearch procedures; a practical approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Basilio, M. B. (2021). Instructional supervision and assessment in the 21 st -century and beyond. Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Development Journal, 4, 1–8.
Buccella, D., Fanti, L., & Gori, L. (2022). “Green” managerial delegation theory. Environment and Development Economics, 27(3), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X21000206
Corrigan, J., & Merry, M. (2022). Principal Leadership in a Time of Change. Frontiers in Education, 7(May), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.897620
Cruz-González, C., Rodríguez, C. L., & Segovia, J. D. (2021). A systematic review of principals’ leadership identity from 1993 to 2019. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 49(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896053
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model Volume 8 – Issue 2 IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education Volume 8 – Issue 2 IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education Volume. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education, 8(2), 89–106.
Gordon, S. (2019). Educational Supervision: Reflections on Its Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Educational Supervision, 2(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.2.2.3
Haradhan Kumar Mohajan. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85654/
Haryanto, H., & Isrohmawati, I. (2023). Manajemen Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset di Madrasah (Studi Kasus di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Kudus Indonesia ). Mau’izhah: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 13(June), 62–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55849/jiem.v1i1.1
Haryanto, Oktapiani, M., Yunindar, Novari, D. M., Missouri, R., Ariyani, R., Hendrawati, T., Widitiarsa, A., Anora, A., Nurhasanah, S., Ahyani, E., & Nugraha, M. S. (2024). Manajemen Pendidikan (P. Adi Fathul Qohar, M & S. H. Afik Fathur Rohman (eds.); 1st ed.). PT Penerbit Qriset Indonesia. admin@qrisetindonesia.com
Kamsiti, K., Putra, A. Y., & Wardiah, D. (2024). Implementation of Academic Supervision by School Principals to Improve Teacher’s Performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 5(2), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v5i2.809
Milhaleva, U. (2020). Innovation in education: Problems and ways of their solution. E3S Web of Conferences, 210. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018054
Moleong, Lexy J. (2018). Qualitative research methodology. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Muhammad Ilham. (2021). Principal Strategies for Developing an Organizational Culture in Education Management. ITQAN: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kependidikan, 12(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.47766/itqan.v12i2.194
Muslihah, E. (2009). School Based Management: Concept Development and its Implementation in Indonesia. Alqalam, 26(No.3), 427–448.
Mustamin, N., & Yasin, M. A. M. Bin. (2012). The Competence of School Principals: What Kind of Need Competence for School Success? Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 6(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v6i1.188
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
Nasution, I., Siahaan, A., Ismail, I., & Sukoco, S. (2022). Teacher’s Perception of the Principal’s Leadership. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6715–6726. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2265
Peurach, D. J., Foster, A. T., Lyle, A. M., & Seeber, E. R. (2021). Democratizing Educational Innovation and Improvement: The Policy Contexts of Improvement Research in Education. CPRE Working Papers, 1–29. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_workingpapers/27
Pratiwi, D. P., & Warlizasusi, J. (2023). The Effect of Principal Leadership and Work Motivation on Junior High School Teacher Performance. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v2i1.16
Roost, S. Van. (2023). Distributed Leadership. Encyclopedia of Tourism Management and Marketing, May, 986–988. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377486.distributed.leadership
Scaffa, M. E. (2007). Introduction to Special Forum on Educational Leadership. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 21(1), 2007. https://doi.org/10.1300/J003v21n01
Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Balbín, A. M. (2020). Global Impact of Local Educational Innovation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12205 LNCS, 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_39
Suchyadi, Y., Indriyani, S. R., & Destiana, D. (2023). Basic Concepts of Educational Supervision Along With Related Administrative Studies. Jhss (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 6(3), 406–410. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v6i3.7506
Sunaryo, Y. (2020). Academic Supervision of School Principals and Teacher Performance: A Literature Review. International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 5(2), 17–34.
Tonich. (2021). The role of principals’ leadership abilities in improving school performance through the school culture. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 47–75.
Windari, Dewi, R., & Sihotang, D. O. (2020). Become a Professional Teacher in the Future. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2020), 488(Aisteel), 214–218. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201124.046
Zhu, J., Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Shared Leadership: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1–23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Haryanto Haryanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
