Standardized Monitoring in Online English Learning: Integrating Context, Pedagogical Pillars, and Monitoring Phases

Authors

  • Karin Sari Saputra Linguistics Department, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Sisilia Setiawati Halimi Linguistics Department, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Harwintha Yuhria Anjarningsih Linguistics Department, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i1.729

Keywords:

Standardized Monitoring Framework (SMF), online English learning, formative feedback, learner engagement, instructional design

Abstract

Monitoring in online English education remains inconsistently defined and often treated as an administrative routine rather than a pedagogical process. This paper addresses that gap by proposing the Standardized Monitoring Framework (SMF)—a theoretically grounded model that integrates monitoring with instruction to enhance quality and engagement. Built through a conceptual synthesis of Learning-Oriented Assessment (LoLA), formative feedback, and digital engagement theories, the SMF establishes five pedagogical pillars: Targeted Content Delivery, Diverse Assessment Strategies, Personalized Formative Feedback, Engagement Optimization, and Comprehensive Learning Evaluation. These pillars operate across four monitoring phases—Preparation, Exploration, Adjustment, and Mastery—supported by three contextual domains of learning foundations, human-centered dynamics, and the instructional monitoring cycle. Drawing illustrative insights from the Elingway platform, the study demonstrates how SMF bridges theory and practice to promote responsive, autonomous, and sustained learning in non-metropolitan digital contexts. The paper concludes by highlighting the framework’s theoretical novelty and its potential for empirical validation in future studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies. Education Sciences, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Andrade, H. (2010). Handbook of Formative Assessment (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874851

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3778083

Brown, C. A. (2024). Role of the English teaching hidden curriculum in sustainability education: The case of Japan. Environmental Education Research, 30(8), 1211–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2309583

Cano García, E., Jardí Ferré, A., Lluch Molins, L., & Martins Gironelli, L. (2024). Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2329170

Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from award-winning practice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740621

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2023). Innovation in Learning-Oriented Language Assessment. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18950-0

Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity. Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01

Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Evolving technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73443

Gozali, I., Istiqomah, F., & Widiati, U. (2022). A Systematic Review of Online ELT Research in Indonesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic Through the Community of Inquiry Framework. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 501–546. https://doi.org/10.28945/5033

Han, W., Apridayani, A., Tang, Y., & Mukrim, M. (2024). Online English Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Lessons from Chinese College Students. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(2), 783–800. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.783.800

Hari Rajan, M., Herbert, C., & Polly, P. (2024). Disrupted student engagement and motivation: Observations from online and face-to-face university learning environments. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1320822. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1320822

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Henderson, M., Ryan, T., & Phillips, M. (2019). The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Isma, A., Basri, M., Abduh, A., Putri, A. M. J., & Hustiana, H. (2024). Empowering E-Learning for English Literacy Development: Insights from Lecturers. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 5(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v5i2.1495

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Li, M. (2022). Multidimensional Analysis and Evaluation of College English Teaching Quality Based on an Artificial Intelligence Model. Journal of Sensors, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1314736

Mahdi, G. S. (2024). The Use of Old and New Methods of Teaching English. Alford Council of International English & Literature Journal, 07(03), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.37854/ACIELJ.2024.73010

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Meng, T., Faizan, A., Baofang, Q., & He, C. (2024). Roles of platform quality, platform satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation toward English learning: Perspective from online platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 13523–13549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12258-7

Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955

Nhan, L. K. (2024). Investigating EFL English-Majored Students’ Perceptions Towards Online Learning: The Case of a University in Vietnam. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i3p123

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Noori, A. (2025). Digital Technologies and Self-Regulated Language Learning: A Systematic Review. Journal of Social Sciences - Kabul University, 8(1), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.62810/jss.v8i1.323

Pratolo, B. W., Fatimah, N., Soviyah, S., & Ali, Z. (2023). Digital Literacy readiness: Voices of Indonesian Primary and Secondary English Teachers. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 5(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i2.6562

Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation (1st printing). Educational Technology Publications.

Rido, A., Prakoso, B. H., & Perez-Amurao, A. L. (2023). A Systematic Review of Asynchronous Online Learning in English Language Classrooms in Indonesia: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives. In V. P. H. Pham, A. Lian, A. Lian, & N. T. Hoang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2022) (Vol. 744, pp. 133–142). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-042-8_12

Sulistyawati, K. T. & Kuswandono, P. (2022). Students’ Self-regulation in English Reading Comprehension during Online Class in Yogyakarta Private Senior High School. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i2.3493

Sun, X. (2023). Influence of Formative Online Teaching Evaluation on Autonomous Learning Ability of Students Majoring in English for Science and Technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(10), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i10.39399

Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). 16. Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Assessment (pp. 255–274). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-018

Utami, S. W., Fitriyah, S. M., & Sundari, S. (2023). ‘It’s complicated’: Teachers’ strategies to deal with the challenges of the online EFL teaching. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 06(01). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-76

Van Der Linden, J., Van Der Vleuten, C., Nieuwenhuis, L., & Van Schilt-Mol, T. (2023). Formative Use of Assessment to Foster Self-Regulated Learning: The Alignment of Teachers’ Conceptions and Classroom Assessment Practices. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 7(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00082-8

Wang, X., Liu, Y., Ying, B., & Lin, J. (2023). The effect of learning adaptability on Chinese middle school students’ English academic engagement: The chain mediating roles of foreign language anxiety and English learning self-efficacy. Current Psychology, 42(8), 6682–6692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02008-8

Weidlich, J. (2025). Highly informative feedback using learning analytics: How feedback literacy moderates student perceptions of feedback. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4e3bh_v2

Yarullina, Zh., & Kopylova, N. (2024). Digital Platforms and Tools for Teaching English at a Technical University. 2024 7th International Conference on Information Technologies in Engineering Education (Inforino), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/Inforino60363.2024.10552013

Zhang, M., & Hong, Y. (2018). Research on the Monitoring of College English Learning Strategies under the Online Autonomous Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Management, Education and Information (MEICI 2018). Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Management, Education and Information (MEICI 2018), Shenzang, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/meici-18.2018.188

Zheng, C., Liang, J.-C., Li, M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The relationship between English language learners’ motivation and online self-regulation: A structural equation modelling approach. System, 76, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.003

Zhou, T., & Zhang, W. (2022). Effectiveness Study on Online or Blended Language Learning Based on Student Achievement: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. Sustainability, 14(12), 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127303

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

2026-01-16

How to Cite

Sari Saputra, K., Setiawati Halimi, S., & Yuhria Anjarningsih, H. (2026). Standardized Monitoring in Online English Learning: Integrating Context, Pedagogical Pillars, and Monitoring Phases. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 7(1), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i1.729