Impacts of ChatGPT on Critical Thinking: Perceptions of Tanzanian Higher Education Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v6i3.568Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Critical Thinking, Higher Education Institutions, TanzaniaAbstract
In Tanzania, perceptions toward the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education, particularly the use of ChatGPT, are mixed, with debates centered on its effects on critical thinking and traditional learning practices. This study explored students’ perceptions of ChatGPT use in academia and provided future directions. Employing a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 170 students across two higher education institutions, the Institute of Finance Management (IFM) and Moshi Co-operative University (MoCU). A total of 133 students responded to online questionnaires. Findings revealed that most students (93%) were aware of and used ChatGPT, mainly for study and writing support. Over half (55%) reported a positive influence on critical thinking, while about one-quarter (26.7%) highlighted negative effects, such as overreliance and disruption of traditional learning. Additionally, a large majority (85.2%) viewed ChatGPT as supportive to education, whereas a minority (14.8%) perceived it as a threat, reflecting broader national dilemmas regarding AI adoption. Notably, 43.1% of respondents expressed uncertainty about its misuse, citing the absence of clear policies and guidelines. The study recommends establishing regulatory frameworks for ChatGPT integration to support, rather than replace, critical thinking, human interaction, and creativity, while ensuring ethical practices in academic use.
Downloads
References
Alali, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). How ChatGPT will shape the teaching learning landscape in future. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(2), 336-345.
AlZaabi, A., ALamri, A., Albalushi, H., Aljabri, R., & AalAbdulsalam, A. (2023). ChatGPT applications in academic research: a review of benefits, concerns, and recommendations. Biorxiv, 2023-08.
Babu, M. A., Yusuf, K. M., Eni, L. N., Jaman, S. M. S., & Sharmin, M. R. (2024). ChatGPT and generation ‘Z’: A study on the usage rates of ChatGPT. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101163.
Bolici, F., Varone, A., & Diana, G. (2024). Unpopular policies, ineffective bans: Lessons learned from ChatGPT prohibition in Italy. ECIS 2024 Proceedings. 11.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2024/track04_impactai/track04_impactai/11
Bozkurt, A., Junhong, X., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., ... & Romero-Hall, E. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53-130.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340.
Elhassan, S. E., Sajid, M. R., Syed, A. M., Fathima, S. A., Khan, B. S., & Tamim, H. (2025). Assessing Familiarity, Usage Patterns, and Attitudes of Medical Students Toward ChatGPT and Other Chat-Based AI Apps in Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e63065.
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100180.
Farid, H. (2024, September 19). Is ChatGPT a double-edged sword in the provision of quality education? The Citizen, ePaper. https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/oped/is-chatgpt-a-double-edged-sword-in-the-provision-of-quality-education--4767064
Islam, I., & Islam, M. N. (2024). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academia. Discover Education, 3(1), 31.
Ivankova, N., & Wingo, N. (2018). Applying mixed methods in action research: Methodological potentials and advantages. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 978-997.
Ja'ashan, M. M. N. H. (2024). Blended Learning with ChatGPT: Combining Traditional Teaching Methods with AI Assistance. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 14107-14118.
Klimova, B., & de Campos, V. P. L. (2024). University undergraduates’ perceptions on the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes: evidence from a university in Czech Republic. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2373512.
Lopes, L. D. S. and Teymourifar, A. (2024, June 13th). Balancing Innovation and Ethics: Integrating ChatGPT in Educational Environments for Enhanced Learning and Responsible Use. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4864015 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4864015
Mambile, C., & Mwogosi, A. (2024). Transforming higher education in Tanzania: unleashing the true potential of AI as a transformative learning tool. Technological Sustainability, 4(1), 51-76.
Marchewka, J. T., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 10.
Matto, G. (2024). Is ChatGPT Building or Destroying Education? Perception of University Students in Tanzania. Journal of Education and Learning Technology (JELT), 5(4), 38-51.
Mbwambo, N. M., & Kaaya, P. B. (2024). ChatGPT in education: Applications, concerns and recommendations. Journal of ICT Systems, 2(1), 107-124.
Mgonja, J. V. (2024). ‘Al in due time’: addressing the ethical and legal gaps of al systems in Tanzania before unlocking its full potential. African Journal of Law, Ethics and Education (ISSN: 2756-6870), 7(4).
Mustapha, R., Mustapha, S. N. A. M., & Mustapha, F. W. A. (2024). Students’ misuse of ChatGPT in higher education: An application of the Fraud Triangle Theory. Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies (JOCSSES) E-ISSN-2785-8774, 4(1), 87-97.
Mwakapina, J. W. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Language Teaching and Learning Practices in Higher Education. Pan-African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 5(2), 106-122.
Niloy, A. C., Bari, M. A., Sultana, J., Chowdhury, R., Raisa, F. M., Islam, A., ... & Hossen, M. A. (2024). Why do students use ChatGPT? Answering through a triangulation approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100208.
Ogalo, E. O., & Mtenzi, F. (2025). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Tools for Learning: Academic Integrity and Ethics in Higher Education in Kenya. In Artificial Intelligence, Digital Learning, and Leadership: Redefining Higher Education (pp. 1-36). IGI Global
Ogugua, D., Yoon, S. N., & Lee, D. (2023). Academic integrity in a digital era: Should the use of ChatGPT be banned in schools? Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 28(7), 1-10.
Pallivathukal, R. G., Soe, H. H. K., Donald, P. M., Samson, R. S., Ismail, A. R. H., & Ismail, A. R. H. I. H. (2024). ChatGPT for academic purposes: survey among undergraduate healthcare students in Malaysia. Cureus, 16(1).
Ponera, J. M., & Madila, S. S. (2024). Harnessing the Use of Artificial Intelligence among Higher Education Institutions in Tanzania: Challenges and Prospects. Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 3 (3), 269-279
Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41-56
Rogers, M. P., Hillberg, H. M., & Groves, C. L. (2024, March). Attitudes Towards the Use (and Misuse) of ChatGPT: A Preliminary Study. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (pp. 1147-1153)
Schoch, K. (2020). Case study research. Research design and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner, 31(1), 245-258.
Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 110-121.
Tarisayi, K. S. (2024). ChatGPT use in universities in South Africa through a socio-technical lens. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2295654.
Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2015). The engagement gap: Exploring gender differences in University–Industry collaboration activities. Research Policy, 44(6), 1176-1191.
Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024). What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 333-355.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478.
Veza, I., Ghazali, I., Putra, A., Ascencio, R. L., Muhammad, M., & Irianto, I. (2023, November). How ChatGPT Affects Education Landscape: Effects of ChatGPT on Higher Education Accessibility and Inclusivity. In International Conference on Advancing and Redesigning Education (pp. 569-579). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Xulu, H. H., Hlongwa, N. S., & Maguraushe, K. (2024, December). Unlocking the Potential of AI in Higher Education: A Multi-Dimensional Study of Chatgpt Adoption at a South African University. In The Focus Conference (TFC 2024) (pp. 516-532). Atlantis Press.
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Valeria Kyumana, George Matto, Jaffar Msafiri Ponera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
