Semantic Ambiguity in the Use of 'Konteks' in Merdeka Curriculum Textbooks: Implications for Learning Outcomes and Pedagogical Strategies

Authors

  • Varary Mechwafanitiara Cantika Curriculum Development, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Aida Ratna Zulaiha Curriculum Development, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Widya Puji Astuti Curriculum Development, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Riche Cynthia Johan Curriculum Development, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v5i3.461

Abstract

This study examines errors in interpreting the word “konteks” (context) and its equivalents in Merdeka Curriculum textbooks for Indonesian Language, Civic Education, and English Language subjects. Semantic ambiguity and inaccuracies in the use of this term have led to misunderstandings that hinder students' comprehension and learning outcomes. The research aims to identify patterns and potential sources of misinterpretation to ensure alignment between textbook language and the learning objectives of the Merdeka Curriculum. Using a qualitative approach with a comparative method, the study analyzed the meaning and usage of “konteks” across subjects. Data were collected through documentation of both explicit and implicit references, followed by descriptive content analysis based on Miles et al.'s interactive model. Triangulation, expert validation, and adherence to ethical standards ensured the validity and reliability of findings. Results indicate that misinterpretations of “konteks” often lead to fragmented understanding, making it difficult for students to connect concepts across academic and social settings. This disrupts cognitive processes, preventing the development of complex analytical skills. To address these issues, teachers should facilitate clarifying exercises and discussions emphasizing context. Additionally, textbook evaluations must prioritize accurate definitions, precise usage, and illustrative examples to minimize ambiguity and enhance learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063

Allen, J. (2023). Words, Words, Words. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032683232

Andini, R., Kiristiyaini, S., Regar, B., Ramadani, S., & Indah, T. (2024). Analisis Kesesuaian Kurikulum Merdeka dengan Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia SMP Kelas VII “ Bahasa Indonesia .” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusa, 8(2), 23357–23361.

Ansori, M. S. (2021). PERUBAHAN MAKNA BAHASA: SEMANTIK-LEKSIOLOGI. SEMIOTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Dan Linguistik, 22(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.19184/semiotika.v22i2.24651

Brundiers, K., Wiek, A., & Redman, C. L. (2010). Real‐world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011077540

Cartwright, K. B., Taboada Barber, A., & Archer, C. J. (2022). What’s the Difference ? Contributions of Lexical Ambiguity, Reading Comprehension, and Executive Functions to Math Word Problem Solving in Linguistically Diverse 3 rd to 5 th Graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(6), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2084399

Cervetti, G. N., Fitzgerald, M. S., Hiebert, E. H., & Hebert, M. (2023). Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Vocabulary Knowledge and Skill. Reading Psychology, 44(6), 672–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2179146

Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2021). The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. The Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266

Cholifah, S., & Faelasup. (2024). Educational Environment in the Implementation of Character Education. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 3(2), 816–825. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v3i2.418

Entwistle, N., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902320634528

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2020). Cognitive Psychology. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351058513

Farrell, T. S. C., & Jacobs, G. M. (2010). Essentials for Successful English Language Teaching. Essentials for Successful English Language Teaching, 38(1), 1–142. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/volume03issue06-12

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A.-T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Filgona, J., Jacob, F., John, S., & Gwany, D. M. (2020). Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Students’ Academic Achievement: a Theoretical Overview. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 14(2), 14–44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344199882

Hamza, K. M., & Wickman, P. (2008). Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education, 92(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20233

Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2014). From Words to Concepts: Focusing on Word Knowledge When Teaching for Conceptual Understanding Within an Inquiry-Based Science Setting. Research in Science Education, 44(5), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9402-5

Hehakaya, E., & Pollatu, D. (2022). Problematika Guru Dalam Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan DIDAXEI, 3(2), 394–408. https://e-journal.iaknambon.ac.id/index.php/DX/article/view/617

Jindal-Snape, D., Hannah, E., Smith, E., Barrow, W., & Kerr, C. (2009). An Innovative Practitioner Research Model of Continuing Professional Development. School Psychology International, 30(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309106495

Kaplan, J. J., Rogness, N. T., & Fisher, D. G. (2014). EXPLOITING LEXICAL AMBIGUITY TO HELP STUDENTS UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF RANDOM. STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 13(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v13i1.296

Kaplan, J., & Rogness, N. (2018). Increasing Statistical Literacy by Exploiting Lexical Ambiguity of Technical Terms. Numeracy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.11.1.3

Listia, R., & Febriyanti, E. R. (2020). EFL Learners’ Problems in Using Tenses: An Insight for Grammar Teaching. IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 9(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2020.9.1.86-95

Maison, & Wahyuni, I. (2021). Guide inquiry science e-module development for improving junior high school students’ scientific literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1), 012089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012089

McKeown, M. G., Crosson, A. C., Moore, D. W., & Beck, I. L. (2018). Word Knowledge and Comprehension Effects of an Academic Vocabulary Intervention for Middle School Students. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 572–616. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217744181

Merisuo-Storm, T. (2016). SIXTH-GRADERS’ ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND TEXTBOOK VOCABULARY. Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic Conference. https://doi.org/10.20472/IAC.2016.022.036

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and M. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. In How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783

Okeeffe, L. (2013). A Framework for Textbook Analysis. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12785/irclr/020101

Petrović, V., & Antić, S. (2021). Typical errors in presenting concepts in textbooks for the first four grades of primary school. Nastava i Vaspitanje, 70(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2101055P

Prihatina, S. A., Sukarno, S., & Triyanto, T. (2022). Internalizing the Social Care Value of Elementary School Students through Character Education. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 14(2), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v14i2.3417

Rahmawati, E., Fitriani, D., Mukti, I. L., & Nurrohman, W. (2022). Teachers’ Efforts in Increasing Eighth Grade of Modern Islamic Boarding School Students’ Learning Motivation in Arabic Class. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(5), 6513–6521. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i5.3714

Rector, M. A., Nehm, R. H., & Pearl, D. (2013). Learning the Language of Evolution: Lexical Ambiguity and Word Meaning in Student Explanations. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1107–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9296-z

Rezkiana, N. M., Manda, D., & Awaru, A. O. T. (2023). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Literasi Digital dalam Mata Pelajaran Sosiologi di Sekolah Menengah Atas ( SMA ) Bosowa School Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 23941–23954. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/download/10407/8345

Sayer, I. M. (2013). Misunderstanding and Language Comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.118

Setyowati, R. N., Sari, M. M. K., & Habibah, S. M. (2018). Improving Critical Thinking Skills of Students through the Development of Teaching Materials. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-18.2018.50

Solihati, N., & Hikmat, A. (2018). Critical Thinking Tasks Manifested in Indonesian Language Textbooks for Senior Secondary Students. SAGE Open, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018802164

Sun, L., & Li, L. (2021). THE ALIGNMENT BETWEEN THIRD-GRADE PRIMARY SCHOOL SCIENCE TEXTBOOKS AND CURRICULUM STANDARDS IN CHINA AND JAPAN. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(3), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.507

Tan, H. S. (2023). Critical Reading Skills in English of Incoming Grade 10 Learners: An Analysis and Interpretation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(10), 3766–3776. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.10.27

Wu, Z. (2020). Exploration on the Causes and Solutions of Cognitive Errors in College English Learning. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200316.151

Yusrina, Y., Tang, M. R., & Saud, S. (2021). Needs Analysis of Teaching Materials for Learning Discourse Analysis. Proceeding of International Conference on Language Pedagogy (ICOLP), 1(1), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.24036/icolp.v1i1.49

Yusup, A., & Jannah, R. (2021). The Role of Education in the Formation of Ecological Culture. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 7(5), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/66/51

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Mechwafanitiara Cantika, V., Ratna Zulaiha, A., Puji Astuti, W., & Cynthia Johan, R. (2024). Semantic Ambiguity in the Use of ’Konteks’ in Merdeka Curriculum Textbooks: Implications for Learning Outcomes and Pedagogical Strategies. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 5(3), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v5i3.461