Polya–Van Hiele Integration Hierarchical Model in Students' Geometric Thinking Processes

Authors

  • Venissa Dian Mawarsari Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Indonesia
  • Martyana Prihaswati Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Indonesia
  • Eko Andy Purnomo Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Indonesia
  • YL Sukestiyarno Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Scolastika Mariani Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Iwan Junaedi Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i3.944

Keywords:

Geometric thinking process, Polya problem-solving, Van Hiele theory, Hierarchical model, Plane geometry

Abstract

This research aims to develop the Polya–Van Hiele Integrated Hierarchical Model to describe students' geometric thinking processes in solving geometry problems. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. The research subjects were selected based on the level of geometric thinking ability in the students. Data was collected through geometric thinking tests and in-depth interviews, then analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. The results of the study show that students' geometric thinking processes develop progressively and are in harmony with the stages of Polya problem-solving, namely understanding problems, making plans, executing plans, and looking back. At the planning stage, students demonstrate skills at the level of visualization and analysis. Furthermore, at the stage of planning implementation, geometric thinking develops towards the level of informal deduction, formal deduction, and precision. At the level of rigor, students are able to provide valid mathematical justifications, compare, and generalize geometric concepts. This research resulted in the Polya-Van Hiele Integrated Hierarchical Model, which shows that the development of geometric thinking is embedded in the process of solving mathematical problems. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aktaş, G. S., & Ünlü, M. (2017). Understanding of Eight Grade Students about Transformation Geometry : Perspectives on Students ’ Mistakes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(5), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i5.2254

Amelia, P. B., & Anugrahana, A. (2024). Studi Pustaka Kemampuan Menganalisis Pada Pembelajaran Geometri Dengan Menerapkan Teori Van Hiele Terhadap Peserta Didik Kelas v SD. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 3(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.58540/jipsi.v3i1.565

Arnal, A., & Víctor, B. (2024). A Characterization of Van Hiele ’ s Level 5 of Geometric Reasoning Using the Delphi Methodology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(3), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10380-z

Atasoy, E. (2019). Elementary Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Geometric Thinking Levels and Their Self-Efficacy in Geometry. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 12(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.12.2.12

Baeti, N., & Murtalib, M. (2019). Analisis Keterampilan Geometri Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tingkat Berpikir Van Hiele di MTs Muhammadiyah 1 Malang. Supermat (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika), 2(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.33627/sm.v2i2.96

Baidowi, Sarjana, K., Novitasari, D., & Kurniawan, E. (2023). Analysis of students’ geometric thinking level in blended learning setting. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2619(July 2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0122569

Basir, M. A., Waluya, S. B., Dwijanto, & Isnarto. (2022). How Students Use Cognitive Structures to Process Information in the Algebraic Reasoning? European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 821–834. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.821

Bonyah, E., & Larbi, E. (2021). Assessing van Hiele’s geometric thinking levels among elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. African Educational Research Journal, 9(4), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.94.21.119

Budayasa, I. K., & Rahaju, E. B. (2025). Probabilistic Thinking Process in Probability Problem-Solving Prospective Mathematics Teacher with Field-Independent based on Polya ’ s Three Stages. Educational Process International Journal, 17, 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.333

Celik, H. S., & Yilmaz, G. K. (2022). Analysis of Van Hiele geometric thinking levels studies in Turkey: A meta-synthesis study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(1), 473–501.

Cesaria, A., Herman, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Level Berpikir Geometri Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i2.2898

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (Fourth Edi) (Paul A. Smith (ed.); 4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Fitriyani, H., Widodo, S. A., & Hendroanto, A. (2018). Students’ Geometric Thinking Based on Van Hiele’S Theory. Infinity Journal, 7(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i1.p55-60

Kandaga, T., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2022). Epistemological Obstacle in Transformation Geometry Based on van Hiele’s Level. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11914

Kholid, M. N., & Aisyah, N. N. (2025). Classification of Abstract Thinking in Solving Mathematical Problems. Educational Process International Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.194

Mahlaba, S. C., & Mudaly, V. (2022). Exploring the relationship between commognition and the Van Hiele theory for studying problem-solving discourse in Euclidean geometry education. Pythagoras, 43(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.659

Mawarsari, V. D., Kintoko, Zaenuri, Kharisudin, I., & Aziz, A. (2023). Students’ Errors in Solving Geometry Problems of Van Hiele Levels Based on Newman’s Error Hierarchy Model. Proceedings of the 2nd UPY International Conference on Education and Social Science (UPINCESS 2023), 0(Upincess), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-176-0_45

Mawarsari, V. D., Rochmad, Purnomo, E. A., & Arum, P. R. (2024). Profile of Van Hiele Geometry Thinking Based on Student. AIP Conference Proceedings, 020016.

Mawarsari, V. D., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Mariani, S., & Junaedi, I. (2024). Students ’ Geometric Thinking Processes in Terms of Spatial Intelligence. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 8666–8683. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5482

Mawarsari, V. D., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Prihaswati, M. (2024). The Analysis of Student’s Needs to Optimize Geometric Thinking Abilities. Proceedings of the 2nd Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences 2023 (LEWIS HUSO 2023), 2023, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-267-5_8

Mawarsari, V. D., Waluya, S. B., & Dewi, N. R. (2023). Profile of Students ’ Geometric Thinking Ability in Terms of Van Hiele Level. Proceeding of 1st Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences 2022 (Lewis 20200), 1, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-078-7

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methodes sourcebook (3rd Ed.). In SAGE Arizona State University. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.25.33.s40

Naja, F. Y., Sa’o, S., & Mei, A. (2021). Tingkat Berpikir Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Bangun Datar Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika Dan Gender. Jurnal Cendekia Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.586

Naufal, M. A. (2021). The effectiveness of infusion of metacognition in van Hiele model on secondary school students’ geometry thinking level. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14331a

Ngirishi, H., & Bansilal, S. (2019). An Exploration of High School Learners’ Understanding of Geometric Concepts. Problems of Education in The 21 Century, 77(1).

Patac, A. V., Patac, L. P., & Crispo, N. E. (2022). Students ’ understanding of a geometric theorem : A case of grade 9 problem posing. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 7(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16394

Purnomo, E. A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Junaedi, I., & Agoestanto, A. (2022). Analysis of Problem Solving Process on HOTS Test for Integral Calculus. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(1), 199–214.

Purnomo, E. A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Junaedi, I., & Agoestanto, A. (2024). Stages of Problem-Solving in Answering HOTS-Based Questions in Differential Calculus Courses. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(6), 116–145.

Rahayu, F. D., Mawarsari, V. D., & Suprapto, R. (2023). Karakteristik Kemampuan Berpikir Geometri Siswa Berdasarkan Level Berpikir Van Hiele Pasca Covid-19. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 400. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v7i2.8372

Rahmah, S. M. (2021). Profil Berpikir Geometri Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Ditinjau Dari Level Berpikir Van Hiele. Mathedunesa, 9(3), 562–569. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n3.p562-569

Ramadhan, D. F., L, E. N., & Apriani, I. F. (2021). Systematic Literature Review: Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Teori Van Hiele Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Siswa SD Pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Pedadidaktika, 8(2), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v8i2.35505

Rejeki, S., Riyadi, & Siswanto. (2021). Analysis of students’ problem-solving ability in solving geometry problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042075

Rizkayati, A., & Sari, E. R. (2026). Kasedesede as a Culturally Responsive Medium for Mathematics Learning : Students ’ Perceptions and Numeracy Outcomes. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 7(1), 252–273. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i1.758

Rong, L., & Mononen, R. (2022). Error analysis of students with mathematics learning difficulties in Tibet. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263221089357

Siagian, P. P. G., Sinaga, B., & Mulyono, M. (2020). Analysis of Difficulty of Student’s Geometry Problem Solving Based on Van Hiele’s Thinking Theory with Macromedia Flash. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i2.13658

Siregar, N. A. R., & Elvi, M. (2024). Kemampuan Berpikir Geometri Mahasiswa Calon Guru Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele. Numeracy Journal, 11(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v11i1.2623

Sukestiyarno, Y. L. (2020). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Unnes Press.

Sunardi, Yudianto, E., Susanto, Kurniati, D., Cahyo, R. D., & Subanji. (2019). Anxiety of students in visualization, analysis, and informal deduction levels to solve geometry problems. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(4), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.4.10

Suraya, A., Fauzi, A., & Hock, T. T. (2019). Geometric thinking of Malaysian elementary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1095–1112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12170a

Toker, Z. (2021). Making Thoughts Visible through Formative Feedback in a Mathematical Problem-Solving Process. International Journal of Contemporary Education Research (IJCER), 8(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.845288

Trimurtini, Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Kharisudin, I. (2023). Effect of Two-Dimensional Geometry Learning on Geometric Thinking of Undergraduate Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i3.5848

Triyani, S., Budayasa, I. K., & Amin, S. M. (2024). How is the elementary students ’ creative thinking process in solving fraction problems using geometric and algebraic solutions ? Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v8i3.3357

Umami, I. N., & Asdarina, O. (2024). Analisis Level Berpikir Geometris Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Lingkaran Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele. Kognitif Jurnal Riset Hots Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1554

Utomo, D. P., Amaliyah, T. Z., & Darmayanti, R. (2023). Students ’ Intuitive Thinking Process in Solving Geometry Tasks from the Van Hiele Level. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i1.11528

Uwurukundo, M. S., Maniraho, J. F., & Tusiime, M. (2022). Enhancing Students’ Attitudes in Learning 3-Dimension Geometry using GeoGebra. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.17

Uygun, T. (2022). Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers ’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(September), 183–203. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.110.9.5

Wulandari, S., Syahbana, A., Shang, Y., Weinhandl, R., & Sharma, R. (2021). Analysis of students ’ thinking level in solving Pythagoras ’ theorem problems based on Van hiele ’ s theory. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 4(2), 124–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v4i2.3905

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Dian Mawarsari, V., Prihaswati, M., Andy Purnomo, E., Sukestiyarno, Y., Mariani, S., & Junaedi, I. (2026). Polya–Van Hiele Integration Hierarchical Model in Students’ Geometric Thinking Processes. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 7(3), 799-825. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i3.944