Digital Technology Integration in Engineering Graphics and Design Education: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices and Challenges

Authors

  • Lutho Mteleli Technology and Vocational Education, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa
  • Thokozani Isaac Mtshali Technology and Vocational Education, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa
  • Ndlelehle Skosana Technology and Vocational Education, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i1.746

Keywords:

Engineering Graphics and Design, Educational Tools, ICT Integration, Teaching Methods

Abstract

This study investigates the use of digital and educational technology tools in Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) lessons in response to the Department of Education’s call for effective technology integration in schools. The study addresses a knowledge gap regarding how EGD teachers utilise available technologies to achieve intended learning outcomes, while also examining the challenges, successes, and pedagogical strategies involved. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews, non-participant classroom observations, and equipment analysis. Purposive sampling was used to select six EGD teachers and seventy-two learners. Guided by the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and constructivist pedagogy, the findings reveal that teachers commonly used smart boards, projectors, and internet-based resources to support demonstrations and visualisation of complex drawings. However, technology integration remained largely supplementary rather than transformative, as digital tools were often used only after traditional lecture-based instruction. The study concludes that EGD teachers have not yet fully integrated technology into lesson planning and delivery. It recommends targeted professional development to promote transformative digital pedagogy and continuous reflective teaching practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhiane, M., & Nafidi, Y. (2026). Integrating Intelligent-Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (Intelligent-TPACK) and Tripartite Models to Examine Teachers’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence (AI). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(2), 229-244. https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajert/article/view/845

Badmus, O. T., & Jita, L. C. (2022). Pedagogical ımplication of spatial visualization: A correlate of students’ achievements in physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.112

Bell, C. A., Dobbelaer, M. J., Klette, K., & Visscher, A. (2019). Qualities of classroom observation systems. School effectiveness and school improvement, 30(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(2), 1–25.

Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods. New York, Oxford University Press.

Candiotes, V., Rauscher, W., & Van Putten, S. (2025). A repurposed geometric reasoning model for Engineering Graphics and Design: a conceptual paper. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 30(3), 100-121. https://doi.org/10.24377/DTEIJ.article3352

Chand, S. P. (2026). Constructivism in theory and practice: implications for classroom pedagogy. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 6(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.6.1.23-29

Chigona, A. (2017). Teachers' understanding of technology usage in rural South African schools. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1548457.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://lccn.loc.gov/97004820

Di, X., & Zheng, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of virtual technologies on students’ spatial ability. Educational technology research and development, 70(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10082-3

Kholid, M. N., Hendriyanto, A., Sahara, S., Muhaimin, L. H., Juandi, D., Sujadi, I., ... & Adnan, M. (2023). A systematic literature review of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Cogent education, 10(2), 2269047. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2269047

Lionenko, M., & Huzar, O. (2023). Development of critical thinking in the context of digital learning. Economics & Education, 8(2), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2023-2-5

Maeko, M. S. A. (2025). English teachers' perspectives on infusing ICT in Engineering Graphics and Design pedagogies using the TPACK framework. African Journal of Online and Distance Education, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v14i1.8334

Masingi, J. (2024). Contextual factors, instructional practices, and challenges in integrating ICT in EGD teaching in Polokwane's selected technical schools. International Journal of Education and Business, 7(1), 23–34.

Mhlanga, D., Denhere, V., & Moloi, T. (2022). COVID-19 and the key digital transformation lessons for higher education institutions in South Africa. Education Sciences, 12(7), Article 464.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. http://www.tpack.org/

Mishra, N. R. (2023). Constructivist approach to learning: An analysis of pedagogical models of social constructivist learning theory. Journal of research and development, 6(01), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.3126/jrdn.v6i01.55227

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2020). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: What 12 years of TPACK research tells us. Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 1–22.

Mlambo, P. B. (2023). Teachers' readiness towards the integration of information and communications technology in teaching and learning of engineering graphics and design in KwaZulu-Natal. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 13(2), 1–15.

Mlambo, P. B., & Sotsaka, D. T. S. (2025). Exploring synergies in Euclidean geometry and isometric drawing: A snapshot on grade 12 mathematics and engineering graphics & design. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(4), em2617. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16172

Mlambo, V., Maeko, T., & Khoza, S. D. (2023). Teachers’ feedback practices and their role in promoting transformative learning in South African classrooms. South African Journal of Higher Education, 37(4), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.20853/37-4-5659

Mollo, N. T. (2022). Continuous Professional Teacher Development Within an Online Teaching Context: An Education Law And Policy Perspective. Journal of Educational Studies, 2022(si1), 52-68. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jeds_v2022_nsi1_a4

Msimango, S. M., & Mtshali, T. I. (2025). The feasibility of a learner-centered approach in a civil technology classroom. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 12(4), 763-769. https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v12y2025i4p763-769id7899.html

Mthethwa, S. E. (2024). An Artist within, brings out the Drawing in Class: A Creative Approach to Teaching and Learning Engineering Graphics and Design. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (EHASS), Volume 5(16), pp 3247-3256. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.202451644

Mtshal, T. I. (2023). Students Metacognitive Challenge in the Interpretation of Mechanical Drawings in Engineering Graphics and Design. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 7(4), 189-203.

Mtshali, T., & Sephokgole, D. (2025). Learning To Teach Orthographic Drawing (Sketching) By Preservice Teachers: A Probe Into A Method That Works For Students In Engineering Graphics And Design. In EDULEARN25 Proceedings (pp. 3185-3189). IATED.

Mtshali, T. I., Ramaligela, S. M., & Makgato, M. (2020). Usage of digital resources in Civil Technology: A case of teaching Tools and Equipment. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(1), 47-55.

Naidoo, D., & Mabaso, M. (2023). Social constructivist pedagogy in business studies classrooms–teachers’ experiences and practices. Perspectives in education, 41(2), 62-76. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-persed_v41_n2_a6

Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative research, 20(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077

Ndlovu, L. K., & Mtshali, T. I. (2025). Tablet adoption and mobile learning impact in high school. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 12(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v12i3.88985

Ngcobo, Z. (2025). Keeping Pace with 21st Century Skills: The Role of Computer-Aided Design in Teaching Engineering Graphics and Design. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(12):546-568. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.12.24

Norlyk, A., & Harder, I. (2010). What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative health research, 20(3), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309357435

Piaget, J. (1972). Psihologie și pedagogie. București: Editura didactică și pedagogică.

Ramatsetse, B., Daniyan, I., Mpofu, K., & Makinde, O. (2023). State of the art applications of engineering graphics and design to enhance innovative product design: a systematic review. Procedia CIRP, 119, 699-709.

Roman, S., & Iryna, S. (2024, May). Features Of Using Computer Graphics Under Conditions Of Distance Learning In Vocational (Vocational And Technical) Education Institutions. In The 19th International scientific and practical conference “Creative business management and implementation of new ideas”(May 14–17, 2024) Tallinn, Estonia. International Science Group. 2024. 281 p. (p. 145).

Sibiya, M. T., & Mtshali, T. I. (2025). Teaching Graphic Communication and Techniques to senior phase Technology learners: A guide for teachers. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 4(2), 195-207.

Singh-Pillay, A., & Sotsaka, D. S. (2016). Engineering graphics and design teachers’ understanding and teaching of assembly drawing. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1213-1228. https://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00668a

Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124

Tajik, O., Golzar, J., & Noor, S. (2025). Purposive sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2025.490681.1029

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y. et al. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Educ Inf Technol 28, 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of healthcare communications, 2(4), 52.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

How to Cite

Mteleli, L., Isaac Mtshali, T., & Skosana, N. (2026). Digital Technology Integration in Engineering Graphics and Design Education: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices and Challenges. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 7(1), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i1.746