Reciprocal Teaching and Literal Reading Comprehension in EFL Classrooms: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Instructional Cycles

Authors

  • St. Asriati Am Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i3.1063

Keywords:

classroom action research, EFL reading, narrative text, reading comprehension, reciprocal teaching

Abstract

This retrospective classroom action research report describes changes in eighth-grade students’ literal comprehension of English narrative texts during the use of Reciprocal Teaching at SMP Negeri 1 Bulukumba. The surviving records covered 30 students, including 16 female and 14 male students, and contained aggregated test results and classroom-participation summaries from a diagnostic assessment and two instructional cycles. Reciprocal Teaching organized reading around predicting, questioning, clarifying, and summarizing. The class mean increased from 54.97 on the diagnostic assessment to 69.97 after Cycle I and 82.23 after Cycle II. The surviving participation summaries also increased from an average of 69% in Cycle I to 83% in Cycle II. These records show a positive descriptive pattern during the two cycles. However, the original test forms, student-level scores, complete observation instrument, and lesson documents were not available when this report was prepared. The findings are therefore presented as a record of change in one classroom, not as proof that Reciprocal Teaching alone caused the improvement or that the results apply to all dimensions of reading comprehension

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993

Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339

Friesen, D. C., Schmidt, K., Atwal, T., & Celebre, A. (2022). Reading comprehension and strategy use: Comparing bilingual children to their monolingual peers and to bilingual adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 986937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986937

Hopkins, D. (1993). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. Open University Press.

Juhkam, M., Jõgi, A.-L., Soodla, P., & Aro, M. (2023). Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: Do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1191103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103

Lestari, A. A. (2016). The effectiveness of reciprocal teaching method embedding critical thinking towards MIA second graders’ reading comprehension of MAN 1 Kendari. Journal of Teaching of English, 1(2), 1–15.

Li, H., & Gan, Z. (2022). Reading motivation, self-regulated reading strategies and English vocabulary knowledge: Which most predicted students’ English reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1041870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041870

Mafarja, N., Mohamad, M. M., Zulnaidi, H., & Fadzil, H. M. (2023). Using reciprocal teaching to enhance academic achievement: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(7), e18269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18269

Mannong, A. B. M. (2018). The implementation of reciprocal teaching method in developing reading comprehension of the second-grade students of SMAN 2 Bantaeng. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v5i2.177

Navaie, L. A. (2018). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.26

Oczkus, L. D. (2010). Reciprocal teaching at work: Powerful strategies and lessons for improving reading comprehension (2nd ed.). International Reading Association.

Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J. S., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2018). Effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of low-achieving adolescents: The importance of specific teaching skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12082

Oo, T. Z., & Habók, A. (2020). The development of a reflective teaching model for reading comprehension in English language teaching. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020.178

Oo, T. Z., Magyar, A., & Habók, A. (2021). Effectiveness of the reflection-based reciprocal teaching approach for reading comprehension achievement in upper secondary school in Myanmar. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09707-8

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

Pornita, D. D., Maximilian, A., & Herlisya, D. (2023). Teaching EFL reading skill using reciprocal teaching strategy: A classroom action research. Jurnal Smart, 9(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.52657/js.v9i2.2113

Purnama, S., Asriati, S., & Hamid, S. M. (2025). The metacognitive self-regulation of students toward English learning achievement at XI SMPN 2 Duampanua Pinrang. English Language Teaching Methodology, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v5i1.589

Qomariyah, N. L., & Taufiq, W. (2025). Gamifying reading: Using Quizizz to boost EFL students’ narrative text skills. Jurnal Metaedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.37058/metaedukasi.v7i1.16224

Rahmani, E. F., Sada, C., & Sumarni. (2013). Improving students’ reading comprehension on narrative text through reciprocal teaching technique. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v2i6.2206

Rastegar, M., Kermani, E. M., & Khabir, M. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive reading strategy use and reading comprehension achievement of EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2017.72006

Ratminingsih, N. M., Artini, L. P., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2017). Incorporating self and peer assessment in reflective teaching practices. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10410a

Rodli, M., & Prastyo, H. (2017). Applying the reciprocal teaching method in teaching reading. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v1n2p112

Syam, S. P., Asriati, S., & Daddi, H. (2024). The impact of instructional intervention on students’ reading comprehension with analytical exposition text. English Language Teaching Methodology, 4(3), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i3.1040

Ueno, S., Ikeda, M., Takeuchi, O., & Teng, M. F. (2025). Impact of reading strategy instruction on improvement of strategy use and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 37(1), 225–247.

Una, S., Arisman, R., Irsawati, S., & Rista, R. (2025). Self-concept on learning English reading comprehension of sophomore secondary school students. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 6(3), 670–684.

Wahyudi, R., & Rozimela, Y. (2024). The reciprocal teaching and reading interest impact on students’ reading comprehension. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 6(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v6i3.22593

Yu, X., Lian, W., Mansor, M. A. B., & Annamalai, N. (2026). A systematic review on the integration of reciprocal teaching in smart classrooms. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 16(2), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2026-0310

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Asriati Am, S. (2026). Reciprocal Teaching and Literal Reading Comprehension in EFL Classrooms: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Instructional Cycles. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 7(3), 1126-1139. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i3.1063