Factors Affecting Decision-Making in the Management of Blended Learning Teaching Activities in Vietnamese Higher Education

Authors

  • Le Anh Phuong Nguyen University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
  • Duy Mong Ha Nguyen University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i3.1015

Keywords:

blended learning, teaching management, decision-making, influencing factors, Vietnamese higher education

Abstract

Blended learning has become an important mode of delivery in higher education, requiring more systematic decision-making in the management of teaching activities. This study examines factors affecting decision-making in the management of blended learning teaching activities within Vietnamese higher education. A quantitatively driven design was employed using survey data from 338 lecturers, including 59 who concurrently held managerial positions, across four higher education institutions in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression, while interview data from 12 participants were used to explain key quantitative patterns. The findings showed that all eight factors were perceived as highly influential, with policy conditions receiving the highest mean score and lecturers’ awareness the lowest, although still within the high range. All factors were positively and significantly correlated, but none showed a statistically significant independent effect in the regression model. Interview data suggested that decision-making was shaped by the combined operation of policy, infrastructure, stakeholder awareness, legal considerations, and managerial capacity rather than by isolated determinants. The study suggests that blended learning management should be understood as a multidimensional and systemic process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adekola, J., Dale, V. H., & Gardiner, K. (2017). Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 25. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1973

Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.693

Ali, R., & Georgiou, H. (2025). A process for institutional adoption and diffusion of blended learning in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 38(3), 523-544. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00359-y

Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6, 638470. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470

Anthony Jr, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 531-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z

Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and information technologies, 24(4), 2523-2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3

Cho, E. (2016). Making reliability reliable: A systematic approach to reliability coefficients. Organizational research methods, 19(4), 651-682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116656239

Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3

Galvis, Á. H. (2018). Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: literature and good practices review. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 15(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0106-1

Hamad, F., Shehata, A., & Al Hosni, N. (2024). Predictors of blended learning adoption in higher education institutions in Oman: theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00443-8

Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224

Hossain, M. K., Salam, M. A., & Akhond, M. R. (2024). Behavioral intentions of university teachers and students toward the adoption of the hyb-blended learning method: Evidence from Bangladesh. Heliyon, 10(14). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34520

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63, 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713

Kieu, T. H., Lee, K. W., Singh, G., Singh, B., Vo, T. D., & Vo, D. H. Q. (2024). Vietnamese lecturers' concerns about blended learning implementation: Insights from concerns-based adoption model. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia, 22(2), 114-140. Retrieved from https://www.seaairweb.info/journal/articles/JIRSEA_v22_n02/JIRSEA_v22_n02_Article07.pdf

Le, K. T., Nguyen, T. N., Ly, K. H., & Tong, V. A. H. (2025). Policy recommendations for blended learning in higher education in Vietnam. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 14(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2025.1.63

Le, T. T. T. (2024). Digitalization of higher education in Vietnam. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v16i2.5710

McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i4.239

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Mezei, P. (2023). Digital higher education and copyright law in the age of pandemic – The Hungarian experience. JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 14(2), 330-350. Retrieved from https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/385

Mohammadi, M., Paasivara, M., & Kasurinen, J. (2025). Blended learning in higher education: good practices in platforms and teachers support, enhancing students motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 30(18), 26001-26024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13770-8

Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea?. The internet and higher education, 18, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001

Nguyen, L. A. P., & Le, H. D. (2026). What drives effective teaching in blended learning? Evidence from core teaching practices in Vietnamese higher education. Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(2), 502-520. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i2.973

Nguyen, D. T., & Tran, V. D. (2025). The impact of community of inquiry on university students’ behavioral intention towards blended learning in Vietnam: the moderating of “understanding Covid-19”. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04930-9

OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

Sareen, S., & Mandal, S. (2024). Challenges of blended learning in higher education across global north-south: A systematic and integrative literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101011

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Thiedig, C., & Wegner, A. (2024). Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: A scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. London Review of Education, 22(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.36

von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-02

How to Cite

Anh Phuong Nguyen, L., & Mong Ha Nguyen, D. (2026). Factors Affecting Decision-Making in the Management of Blended Learning Teaching Activities in Vietnamese Higher Education. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 7(3), 843-862. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v7i3.1015